Comments on: RSS is far from dead, long live web feeds http://www.techiteasy.org/2009/09/07/rss-is-far-from-dead-long-live-web-feeds/ A Technology and Business Weblog provided to You by a Global Group of Friends. Wed, 29 Dec 2010 19:44:30 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4 By: Vincent van Wylick http://www.techiteasy.org/2009/09/07/rss-is-far-from-dead-long-live-web-feeds/#comment-5044 Vincent van Wylick Sun, 20 Sep 2009 18:57:27 +0000 http://www.techiteasy.org/?p=2326#comment-5044 I completely agree on the integral nature of RSS. I already noticed it installing the Xbox Media Centre on my ancient Xbox and, through the power of RSS, being able to get anything from Youtube to News on my TV. Challenges of RSS are significant however, though whether it is really important or not, I'm not sure. For one, it takes the focus away from the site and many businesses/bogs/etc. still think it a rather silo-like matter, mostly influenced by advertisers who just want easily measurable clicks. I'm sure that can be overcome however, the question is whether people are ready to accept hybrids between the open infrastructure of RSS and the closed one of the URL. Since it's arrival, it has yet to be mastered. What else… feedreaders. You're right, Twitter, Facebook, etc. have revolutionised/replaced feed readers in many ways, which doesn't make RSS dead, just the reader and by default perhaps our association between the two. It's still far more efficient to read news through a reader than it is via individual websites. Perhaps that is even surpassed by the social feed reader, aka social networks, but I'm somewhat skeptical. RSS: an interesting technology with huge potential, but only monetisable/usable if integrated well with content and consumption. I completely agree on the integral nature of RSS. I already noticed it installing the Xbox Media Centre on my ancient Xbox and, through the power of RSS, being able to get anything from Youtube to News on my TV.

Challenges of RSS are significant however, though whether it is really important or not, I'm not sure. For one, it takes the focus away from the site and many businesses/bogs/etc. still think it a rather silo-like matter, mostly influenced by advertisers who just want easily measurable clicks. I'm sure that can be overcome however, the question is whether people are ready to accept hybrids between the open infrastructure of RSS and the closed one of the URL. Since it's arrival, it has yet to be mastered.

What else… feedreaders. You're right, Twitter, Facebook, etc. have revolutionised/replaced feed readers in many ways, which doesn't make RSS dead, just the reader and by default perhaps our association between the two. It's still far more efficient to read news through a reader than it is via individual websites. Perhaps that is even surpassed by the social feed reader, aka social networks, but I'm somewhat skeptical.

RSS: an interesting technology with huge potential, but only monetisable/usable if integrated well with content and consumption.

]]>
By: oldephartte http://www.techiteasy.org/2009/09/07/rss-is-far-from-dead-long-live-web-feeds/#comment-5016 oldephartte Tue, 08 Sep 2009 14:41:47 +0000 http://www.techiteasy.org/?p=2326#comment-5016 I've long noticed the influence of social bookmarking sites and group news sites as allowing more flexible interaction. Now Twitter and online ID schemes are thrashing out even more options. My Care2 friends have complained about DDOS attacks for months now. Booman Tribune has a bunch of Spam comment accounts being activated. Security has been saying for some time that the online crooks are winning the fight for web dominance . Governments are setting up propaganda portals and 'blogs' to pump out sculpted 'views' to readers. Even Huffington Post and al Jazeera have been co-opted by corporations and tricle down continues. A few years back I noticed 'trolls' appear to disrupt online forums. Now they are influencing those with private memberships and ratings. I run RSS feeds to a number of schemes to keep up with 'real' people. Hosted portals are vulnerable to perversion by ad considerations, so I have online accounts with Pageflakes and Netvibes and check out some news sharing groups. Real News is much superior to the CNN/Fox crowd, but I think even it apologizes for the view prepared for the military to consume...as opposed to scholarly approaches. It's wild when standard toolkit includes Fact Check organizations to track who's funding what so you know which agenda they are lobbying! I've long noticed the influence of social bookmarking sites and group news sites as allowing more flexible interaction. Now Twitter and online ID schemes are thrashing out even more options.
My Care2 friends have complained about DDOS attacks for months now. Booman Tribune has a bunch of Spam comment accounts being activated. Security has been saying for some time that the online crooks are winning the fight for web dominance . Governments are setting up propaganda portals and 'blogs' to pump out sculpted 'views' to readers. Even Huffington Post and al Jazeera have been co-opted by corporations and tricle down continues.
A few years back I noticed 'trolls' appear to disrupt online forums. Now they are influencing those with private memberships and ratings.
I run RSS feeds to a number of schemes to keep up with 'real' people. Hosted portals are vulnerable to perversion by ad considerations, so I have online accounts with Pageflakes and Netvibes and check out some news sharing groups. Real News is much superior to the CNN/Fox crowd, but I think even it apologizes for the view prepared for the military to consume…as opposed to scholarly approaches.
It's wild when standard toolkit includes Fact Check organizations to track who's funding what so you know which agenda they are lobbying!

]]>